How do "they" control the world?
The quick and thorough explanation of everything.

military industrial banking intelligence complex

This is a simple explanation of how "they" control the world. This will explain how and why "they" killed John F. Kennedy, what "they" were doing in Vietnam, not to mention explaining one hundred years of unexplainable foreign policy and wars. You will see who "they" are. Also, you will learn how "they" control what the people think, and how "they" do it.

Ten thousand years ago when civilization began, commerce was simply trading. Trading goods is a reliable economic method, because the value of your economy always equals the value of goods within the economy. There is no such thing as debt spending, or trade deficits, or monetary policy. You simply produce and trade what you produce.

Trading was simplified with coins, but value of trade was still maintained. Many coins had value of their metal, so they stayed intrinsically stable. The big change of civilization began when a group of people called Goldsmiths began to print receipts for their gold holdings. These receipts supposedly had the value of the gold in deposit. Of course, unchecked corruption began unchecked gold receipt printing, and thus for the first time, "shadow" control of economies.

Proving control by this shadow government is simple. One simply needs to look at the latest Forbes' richest person list. One will find that a software giant like Bill Gates can top the list with a measly $20 billion dollars, while the owners of the largest international banks and oil companies aren't even billionaires. How can this be possible? The trillions of profit dollars a year from world's national debts and oil far exceeds the millions made in software. The yearly interest on national debts around the world (just US national debt is $7 trillion) could buy out Bill Gates' Microsoft without breaking a sweat.

The power and control of the money printers, or "bankers" wasn't always in the shadows. During the 1800s, their blatant and arrogant control over governments and foreign policy began to outrage the public. The repercussions of the backlash called for a new secretive control system inflicted upon the planet during the 1900s. In the late 1800s, the prevalent anger of these bankers in Europe (who happened to be mainly Jewish) is what sparked the anti-Semitism which led to the holocaust. The irony being that the Nazi Party was funded and supported by these bankers (Jewish or not) which proves they care more about profits than their fellow man. In these early years, the media and leaders had openly discussed bankers by name, and their excesses in power. In Germany, Otto Van Bismark said, "I fear that Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and will use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos in order that the earth should become the inheritance of Israel." (Interview by C. Seim, La Vieille France, March, 1921.) The German leader specifically was talking about the Rothschild banking family.

Do our national debt payments go to international bankers? If one out of every 20 American citizens held the bond debt of the United States, those U.S. citizens would each have on average 60 million dollars in bonds. Any reasonable person knows this isn't possible. This debt is owed to private banking institutions, and anybody can prove this themselves with simple research. Now we can address a crucial piece of information, which is that the Federal Reserve Bank is not part of the Treasury Department, or any branch of government. The Federal Reserve Bank is a private bank, privately owned. This is not classified, one can simply ask them, check their web site, or find out in a number of ways. The Federal Reserve Act was initially brought to Congress as the Aldrich Act, named after the banker who wrote it.

The power to print money is arguable the most powerful ability on the planet. Americans owe their worth to pieces of paper which say "Federal Reserve," a private bank established in 1913. During the 1800s, the central bank was the biggest issue of the United States. Although we aren't taught this in school, much of the writings from Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, to Abraham Lincoln are entrenched with their opinion of these bankers' power. For some reason, this has been written out of history, despite the fact that the coming and going of central banks has been the basis of elections for the first hundred years in this country. Andrew Jackson, who ran exclusively on the banking issue and won, killed the central bank for the second time in 1836! One could claim that the end of the First National Bank, and the immediate followup of the 1812 war was a coincidence. Wars are never a coicidence. Congressman Charles Lindbergh said about the 1913 Federal Reserve Act, "When the President [Wilson] signs this Bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized."

Why is it so important to be the one who prints money? This should be obvious, but has outstretching reaches further than most people could imagine. I already mentioned that there was a time when the money printing was a receipt for gold that actually existed. Now the money doesn't actually have any value, so it can be simply printed at will. Even if we still were still on a gold standard, the bankers own and control the price of gold. Having the ability to print money at will through Federal Reserve loans and non-backed "foreign support" is the regular practice of the international private bankers. This means that an economy can simply be boomed or busted by a whim of a banker. What popular economists call the "business cycle" should actually be called the "banker cycle." If you printed your own currency, you would be locked away. During the Great Depression, Automaker Henry Ford said, "It is well enough that the people of this nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."

How do these bankers keep an entire world secretly brainwashed? It's not as difficult as one might think, especially for somebody who controls every aspect of the world's economy. The control is as simple as this: Fund what you need, bankrupt/discredit what you dislike. Its that simple. It applies as large scale as governments of nations, and as small scale as talk show hosts. It applies to elected officials, CEOs, foreign officials, media companies, and the list goes on. Having the media and elected officials in your pocket means you can create policy, persuade populations, or choose a Federal Reserve chairman. The ambition of this monarchy doesn't stop there. Bankers created the Civil War in America simply by funding the separatists in the south. With research, one can find that every nation, whether "friend or foe," has been funded and put in power by those in the driving seats of the banks. If you search education and Public Broadcasting, you will see the many bankers providing the funds: Rockefeller, Carnagie, Warburg.

This gets a little more complicated, when we cover foreign policy. If a banker wanted country A to attack country B, they would need to do three things. One is convince their "elected" officials. Two is convince to public. Three is to create the "justifications" which slip these mindsets into actions. Creating justifications (these include Pearl Harbor, the sinking of the Louisiana, blowing up the Maine, September 11, etc) demonstrates the bankers' control over the military, and especially the "National Intelligence" sector of the military. This is extremely important, and once again, not very difficult for those who have top public officials in their pocket. In 1962, the Department of Defense created a now declassified document called "Operation Northwoods, the justification for military intervention in Cuba." The cold hearted manipulation of a "justification" can be summarized in one line of the document which reads, "Blow up US ship, blame Cuba." It seems mad, yet this is standard operating procedure of our Military Industrial Complex.

It is too simple to say that "they" control the CIA, or they control the president. You can say that "they" stack the White House with their goons, as they stack every institution or nation. Using influence, they put their goons in the CIA. This explains why the CIA is stacked with criminals, from every drug dealing Mafia of the world. Since "they" are criminals, "they" need criminals with National Security clearance to perform their tasks. This also explains why nobody can figure out who killed JFK. Was it the Mafia? Was it the CIA? Was it anti-Cuban nationals from the failed Bay of Pigs operation? YES. The Mafia criminals on the CIA payroll who worked on the Bay of Pigs operation, such as Johnny Roselli, were in charge of the JFK assassination operation. Consequently, Johnny Roselli ended up dead when the 1978 Select Congressional Assassinations committee requested his presence. Apparently, the evidence linking to the real killers isn't nearly as hidden as the media has been convincing the public. Why did "they" kill the president? Well, the president must have figured out who "they" are, because in his last few months alive, he tried to destroy the Federal Reserve Bank and reign in control of the CIA.

I still haven't mentioned the ongoing institutions that have been crucial for broad control over media, government, and education. These secret institutions have big names and nefarious origins. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is often at the top of any conspiracy theorist's list. This institution, started by the banker J.P. Morgan in the early 1900s, has members including every media spokesperson, every major CEO, much of Congress, University Professors, and anybody with any political sway. This is one method to control information. One can also notice that all the president's advisors are on what's known as the Trilateral Commission. In addition, every morning the President gets his "intelligence briefing." This carefully planned presentation seeds the thoughts of the President's entire day. The criminal Yale fraternity known as the "Skull and Bones," which is practically protected by Act of Congress, seeds powerful institutions of our government in the highest aspects. These institutions combined with monetary control and funding are the principle methods used by bankers to convince the public to comply with their plans.

Am I crazy enough to say that without these bankers, there would be no war? No, it's not crazy, but war is long outdated. Wars were once fought for tangible property, both for the Lords and warriors. Now, a complicated world of economics and interests groups has the entire planet plunged in a world of chaotic battles and wars, with the real reasons for each fight hidden from the public. Its crazy to think that a few poor fundamentalists can create a hi-tech terrorist group, or run a nation. Every "rogue nation" or "terrorist group" has a huge network of funding and connections. One can often easily trace funding of terrorist groups to some national resource, such as diamonds, cocaine or opium. Maybe the fact that the diamond mines funding "terrorists" are owned by international bankers is just a coincidence?

Is it also a coincidence that the cocaine/opium dealing Mafia around the world works in close connection with major nations' Intelligence Agencies? CIA agents often call this "an evil alliance of necessity for National Security." Whose necessity? There is always a discrepency between the media's vision of the world, and the CIA's daily alliances. One perfect example would be the 1972 Munich Olympics, where PLO operative Ali Hassan Salameh murdered the Israeli athletes. Mossad then killed Hassan with a car bomb. "But it is now known that the assassination robbed the United States of its chief contact" (Newsweek, 11/9/98, page 36).

Before Martin Luther King Jr was shot, he began speaking against the U.S. policy of creating civil wars. In his own words at New York's Riverside Church on April 4, 1967:
"...the United States came and started supporting a man named Diem, who turned out to be one of the most ruthless dictators in the history of the world. He set out to silence all opposition. ...The peasants watched as all this was presided over by United States influence and then by increasing numbers of United States troops who came to help quell the insurgency that Diem's methods had aroused....we increased our troop commitments in support of governments which were singularly corrupt, inept, and without popular support... Now they languish under our bombs and consider us.. their real enemy. They move sadly and apathetically, we herd them off the land of their fathers into concentration camps... They know they must move or be destroyed by our bombs."

Is it also a coincidence that the United States with "good intentions" put many enemies of the last 50 years into power? Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the Taliban in Afghanistan, Noriega in Panama, and future enemies are put in power everyday. The Northern Alliance in Afghanistan is a brutal drug dealing Mafia. The KLA in Yugoslavia is also a drug dealing brutal Mafia regime. The United States has recently been entrenched with the task of putting cocaine dealing fascist dictator in Columbia. Whose interests are we really working for? Besides creating wars, banks also heavily profit from drug laundering (probably more than oil). Drug trafficking also helps prevent the poor for empowering themselves as they are busy fighting their own inner city street wars. Its no wonder our government is filled with a drug trafficking protection force. The radical right accuses former President Clinton of protecting the Mena Arkansas drug trafficking trade, and ignores the fact that Iran-Contra was the formation of that drug trade. Arkansas Governor Clinton was protecting his fellow Yalie George Bush's and Oliver North's drug trade.

John Stockwell, CIA Agent, member National Security Counsel, explains: "...we were not attacking the Soviet Union and CIA's activities, we were attacking people in the third world. They undertake operations in every corner of the globe. They undertook the license of operating totally above and beyond U.S. law. They had a license to kill, license to smuggle drugs... meanwhile, battled to convert the U.S. legal system in such a way to give them control of our society.... 3,000 major operations and over 10,000 minor operations, everyone of them illegal, everyone of them disruptive of the lives and societies of other peoples, and many of them bloody and gory beyond comprehension. Extensively we manipulated and organized the overthrow of functioning constitutional democracies in other countries. We organized secret armies and directed them to fight in just about every continent in the world. We encouraged ethnic minorities to rise up and fight."

Its quite a coincidence that the creation of the state of Israel in Palestine was 1947, same year the Central Intelligence Agency was created. Many are frustrated with the continuous climate of fighting in Israel, even though Israel was offered as a land of peace for Jews. The bankers will never allow peace, because the Rothschilds did not create Israel to be a land of peace, but rather a tool for perpetual divisions between the semitic peoples of the Middle East, and the incoming European and Russian jews. When all efforts to encourage war were curbed by Rabin, Israeli Intelligence had him killed. On November 13, 1997, Lyse Doucet explains to the BBC a recently declassified report, "The report says Mr Raviv [Israeli Secret Service] knew of his friends intention to murder the Prime Minister. There have been accusations that the Shin Bet secret service was involved in a conspiracy to murder Mr Rabin..." This makes sense when the goal of Israel is to manipulate the Jews as a tool for division and war. This plan is documented at least as far back as 1917, the Balfour Declaration, a letter to Lionel Rothschild.

The United States has conveniently bottled itself in all peace negotiations. The BBC article, "Arab press upbeat on peace hopes," reports 7/17/99: "remarks made by Mr Barak to The Washington Post newspaper in which he called for the USA to reduce its involvement in the peace process from a major to a minor role." Then New York Times explains, "two months after the Camp David peace talks had failed, [Barak] proclaimed that he and Mr. Arafat would be the ultimate Israeli-Palestinian peace parters..'more so than Rabin'" (7/26/01, Deborah Sontag). Then immedately after, Sharon was railroaded in as Prime Minister.

The real source of division is a very few people who are orchestrating continual fighting. Arafat has stated, "Hamas is a creature of Israel which, at the time of Prime Minister Shamir, gave them money and more than 700 institutions, among them schools, universities and mosques." December 12, 2001 in the Italian paper, L'Espresso, Arafat is quoted as saying, "Hamas was constituted with the support of Israel. The aim was to create an organization antagonistic to the PLO. They (Hamas) received financing and training from Israel. They have continued to benefit from permits and authorizations, while we have been limited even [for permits] to build a tomato factory. Rabin himself defined it a fatal error. Some collaborationists of Israel are involved in these [terrorist] attacks. We have the proof and we are placing it at the disposal of the Italian government too."

Why create wars? George Orwell says in 1984 that war keeps the structure of society intact. This is done in a number of ways, partly by the destruction of the advance of civilization in a fair way. Probably even more important is the creation of debt. A country will borrow massive amounts of money from international bankers for war. In addition, it's easier to change policy (like remove civil liberties) in times of threats. It doesn't matter who wins the war, bankers lend to both sides of every war. Debt moves power from the people directly to the bankers, continuously. Their systems of world control are thorough, and refined, and are being improved every day. Controversial organizations such as the World Bank and World Trade Organization, which are the focus of massive modern protests, are simply international organizations which further breakdown national sovereignty towards international banker control.

As I said at the beginning, there was a time when none of this was secret. Our founding fathers were well aware of who the real enemy was, and spoke often of them. They even spoke of them in the context of the causes for the American Revolution. They also laid down the tools to protect the people. These tools have been ignored, and faded over the years, as the United States has gone from bankers' biggest enemy, to their strongest tool. Our founding fathers gave our government the Constitutional right to print government currency, and keep power out of the hands of the bankers. This tool was only utilized by the great President, Abraham Lincoln, but retracted soon after his assassination. Lincoln said "The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. The banking powers are more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy."

It should upset the population that the WTO's rulings supercede national sovereignty of our nation, yet the media hasn't brought up this issue. George Washington said, "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world." When did that policy change? By coincidence, we took a major turn at time of the creation of the Federal Reserve, which was immediately followed by World Wars, the Cold War, and then Terrorism Wars. The pattern is clear. World Wars allowed the world progression to break down for Cold War, which allowed the systematic rape of every third world country into chaos. Stronger nations were militarized. This allowed the preparation for the one world government, seeded by the Cold War established world terrorism networks. James Madison said, "History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible, to maintain their control over governments, by controlling money and its issuance."

last updated February 3, 2002